<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
<channel>
	<title>Seventy% - Topic: Tasty Healthy Chocolate</title>
	<link>http://www.seventypercent.com/forum/news/tasty-healthy-chocolate/</link>
	<description><![CDATA[Changing the way we eat chocolate]]></description>
	<generator>Simple:Press Version 4.5.0</generator>
	<atom:link href="http://www.seventypercent.com/forum/?news&#038;tasty-healthy-chocolate&#038;xfeed=topic" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
<item>
	<title>Hans-Peter Rot on Tasty Healthy Chocolate</title>
	<link>http://www.seventypercent.com/forum/news/tasty-healthy-chocolate/#p7318</link>
	<category>News</category>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.seventypercent.com/forum/news/tasty-healthy-chocolate/#p7318</guid>
	<description><![CDATA[<p>I don't doubt the product at all. It's that the advertizing from you and from the company were way off. If a company can't advertize their product properly, then what reason is there to believe that it will be of good quality?</p>
]]></description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jan 2006 22:32:18 +0000</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
	<title>drmike on Tasty Healthy Chocolate</title>
	<link>http://www.seventypercent.com/forum/news/tasty-healthy-chocolate/#p7317</link>
	<category>News</category>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.seventypercent.com/forum/news/tasty-healthy-chocolate/#p7317</guid>
	<description><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the feedback.  Sorry if I posted incorrectly but my feeling was quite good when I eat the chocoalate no matter the data....it is a great product and without all the unecessary contaminants.</p>
<p><a href="mailto:rainspirit..healthfocus@hotmail.com">rainspirit..healthfocus@hotmail.com</a></p>
]]></description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jan 2006 03:00:44 +0000</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
	<title>Hans-Peter Rot on Tasty Healthy Chocolate</title>
	<link>http://www.seventypercent.com/forum/news/tasty-healthy-chocolate/#p7316</link>
	<category>News</category>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.seventypercent.com/forum/news/tasty-healthy-chocolate/#p7316</guid>
	<description><![CDATA[<p>I believe the 61% cacao and 45% cane sugar were in regards to the chocolate by itself (i.e. the ingredients of the chocolate, not the product as a whole), but still, if you add those two numbers, the total is 106.</p>
]]></description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 23 Jan 2006 23:44:53 +0000</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
	<title>ellie on Tasty Healthy Chocolate</title>
	<link>http://www.seventypercent.com/forum/news/tasty-healthy-chocolate/#p7315</link>
	<category>News</category>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.seventypercent.com/forum/news/tasty-healthy-chocolate/#p7315</guid>
	<description><![CDATA[<p>Very confusing site, list trustwothy info IMHO ever. 61% cacao + 45% cane sugar + some maca, kiwicha(which are probably ground and normaly needs to be used in larger amounts then supplement herbs, they are more of a nutriments), +herbs - will make more then 110% total?</p>
]]></description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 23 Jan 2006 23:06:06 +0000</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
	<title>Hans-Peter Rot on Tasty Healthy Chocolate</title>
	<link>http://www.seventypercent.com/forum/news/tasty-healthy-chocolate/#p7314</link>
	<category>News</category>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.seventypercent.com/forum/news/tasty-healthy-chocolate/#p7314</guid>
	<description><![CDATA[<p>Also, according to various sites, the cacao is sourced from Bolivia and the Dominican Republic, not Brazil. And correct me if I'm wrong, but from my understanding, each ball contains two capsules of herbs? And the fat content is a mere 1.5g per ball, so each one contains less than 5g of actual chocolate.</p>
]]></description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 23 Jan 2006 17:02:20 +0000</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
	<title>Masur on Tasty Healthy Chocolate</title>
	<link>http://www.seventypercent.com/forum/news/tasty-healthy-chocolate/#p7313</link>
	<category>News</category>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.seventypercent.com/forum/news/tasty-healthy-chocolate/#p7313</guid>
	<description><![CDATA[<p>I've not heard of "CHOCOMACA" but I found this a link:<br />
[url]http://www.organic-chocolates.com/[/url]</p>
<p>It's only 61% cocoa and 45% unrefined cane sugar in this product according to the FAQ. </p>
<p><font size="1">"Porcelana: The Holy Grail of Pure Criollos" (Maricel E. Presilla)</font id="size1"></p>
]]></description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 23 Jan 2006 14:24:41 +0000</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
	<title>drmike on Tasty Healthy Chocolate</title>
	<link>http://www.seventypercent.com/forum/news/tasty-healthy-chocolate/#p661</link>
	<category>News</category>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.seventypercent.com/forum/news/tasty-healthy-chocolate/#p661</guid>
	<description><![CDATA[<p>Dear chocolate lovers,</p>
<p>Have any of you heard of "CHOCOMACA"?  This is worth a tasty chew. 85% pure Brazilian cacao mixed with power plants from the Amazon.  This will drive your buds bananas without a trip to the Rainforest!</p>
<p>rainspirit..386-418-0248</p>
]]></description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 23 Jan 2006 14:00:06 +0000</pubDate>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>