| User |
Post |
|
8:58 am September 19, 2005
|
|
Polarbear
|
|
|
Tromsø, Norway
|
|
|
|
|
Member
|
|
posts 299
|
|
|
|
|
Yesterday, I finally saw the ultimate movie for all us choc freaks… althought Willy Wonka probably doesn’t make single estate choc (when comes Lumpaland Grand Cru?), I really enjoyed it, but I would have wished that the movie was slightly more “dark” and weird in the Tim Burton way…[;)]
***
My name is Polarbear and I am a chocoholic…
|
***
My name is Polarbear and I am a chocoholic…
|
|
|
5:29 pm September 19, 2005
|
|
Hans-Peter Rot
|
|
|
USA
|
|
|
|
|
Member
|
|
posts 1462
|
|
|
|
|
I have a bar of Willy Wonka “55% au Lait aux Croquants de Noix de Pecan” here. I heard rumors that squirrels processed the pecans for this one.
|
|
|
3:18 pm September 21, 2005
|
|
green
|
|
|
Trondheim, Norway
|
|
|
|
|
Member
|
|
posts 103
|
|
|
|
|
Imagine being in that factory, and everyting there being high-end chocolate! [:0]
|
|
|
5:36 pm September 21, 2005
|
|
Hans-Peter Rot
|
|
|
USA
|
|
|
|
|
Member
|
|
posts 1462
|
|
|
|
|
Sort of like Michel Cluizel and Chocolate Factory? [;)]
|
|
|
2:34 pm September 23, 2005
|
|
ellie
|
|
|
london, United Kingdom
|
|
|
|
|
Member
|
|
posts 308
|
|
|
|
|
Lot of chocolate decor – trees, flowers etc been created by these guys: http://www.choccywoccydoodah.com. After filming he had some displayed in the shop.
|
|
|
11:47 pm February 27, 2006
|
|
Ariel
|
|
|
Australia
|
|
|
|
|
Member
|
|
posts 21
|
|
|
|
|
In the original movie, does anyone think the ‘chocolate’ river looked like polluted water. it looked nothing like chocolate at at all. i love the new movie though.
|
|
|
|
|
12:25 am February 28, 2006
|
|
Hans-Peter Rot
|
|
|
USA
|
|
|
|
|
Member
|
|
posts 1462
|
|
|
|
|
That’s because it is. Not chocolate at all.
|
|
|
12:44 am February 28, 2006
|
|
Ariel
|
|
|
Australia
|
|
|
|
|
Member
|
|
posts 21
|
|
|
|
|
i know that, but it looked like brown water. its too thin and waterey. And one question, wouldnt melted chocolate be hot?
|
|
|
|
|
1:50 am February 28, 2006
|
|
gap
|
|
|
Melbourne, Australia
|
|
|
|
|
Member
|
|
posts 199
|
|
|
|
|
Depends on your definition of “hot”. But generally no, most people wouldn’t find chocolate that was just melted to be hot.
|
|
|
4:29 pm February 28, 2006
|
|
Hans-Peter Rot
|
|
|
USA
|
|
|
|
|
Member
|
|
posts 1462
|
|
|
|
|
Your body temperature is 98.6 F, so anything above that would feel considerably warmer, or even hot. Melted chocolate won’t solidify if its suspended in a sea of water, so it could be much cooler than body temp and not feel warm.
Have you ever noticed how metal objects sometimes feel cold? The truth is, they’re not “cold,” per se, but rather, they’re at room temp and your body temp is higher than that. If the temp in the room is 70 F, *everything* will feel cold because it’s 28.6 degress cooler than your body!
|
|
|
4:43 am March 2, 2006
|
|
Ariel
|
|
|
Australia
|
|
|
|
|
Member
|
|
posts 21
|
|
|
|
|
Im not with ya. Im australian, i dont get Farenheit.
%…*Ariel*…%
|
|
|
|
|
4:11 pm March 2, 2006
|
|
Marcellus
|
|
|
|
|
|
Member
|
|
posts 70
|
|
|
|
|
1)Subtract 32
2) Add 1/9 th
3) Divide by 2
= Centigrade
Dead easy !! – except for that awkward 1/9th !!!
|
|
|
6:19 pm March 2, 2006
|
|
Snowbeast
|
|
|
Linköping, Sweden
|
|
|
|
|
Member
|
|
posts 17
|
|
|
|
|
Eh? Don’t you just subtract 32 then divide by 1.8?
|
|
|
1:52 am March 3, 2006
|
|
Hans-Peter Rot
|
|
|
USA
|
|
|
|
|
Member
|
|
posts 1462
|
|
|
|
|
Do this to convert:
F to C: subtract by 32; divide by 9; multiply by 5
C to F: multiply by 9; divide by 5; add 32
There are several sites that offer quick and simple temperature conversion.
|
|
|
2:28 am March 3, 2006
|
|
oz_choc
|
|
|
Kandos, Australia
|
|
|
|
|
Member
|
|
posts 98
|
|
|
|
|
Ariel wrote: Im not with ya. Im australian, i dont get Farenheit.
Ariel – I’m getting used to young girls playing dumb, but please don’t blame the fact that you “don’t get” Fahrenheit on being Australian.
For starters, if you learn to spell Fahrenheit correctly, it might help you do a search for a conversion calculator on Google. (Quite apart from the fact that you don’t actually need a conversion, given that Montegrano began his explanation by TELLING you what body temperature is in F).
Sam
|
|
|
5:33 am March 3, 2006
|
|
Masur
|
|
|
Stockholm, Sweden
|
|
|
|
|
Member
|
|
posts 592
|
|
|
|
|
Celcius to farenheit conversion calculator:
[url]http://www.metric-conversions.org/temperature/celcius-farenheit.htm[/url]
“Porcelana: The Holy Grail of Pure Criollos” (Maricel E. Presilla)
|
“Porcelana: The Holy Grail of Pure Criollos” (Maricel E. Presilla)
|
|
|
4:21 pm March 3, 2006
|
|
Hans-Peter Rot
|
|
|
USA
|
|
|
|
|
Member
|
|
posts 1462
|
|
|
|
|
Fahrenheit is even spelled incorrectly in that link, masur!
|
|
|
7:15 pm March 3, 2006
|
|
Masur
|
|
|
Stockholm, Sweden
|
|
|
|
|
Member
|
|
posts 592
|
|
|
|
|
This “celsius to fahrenheit conversion calculator” is the correct one[:)]
[url]http://www.metric-conversions.org/temperature/celsius-fahrenheit.htm[/url]
“Porcelana: The Holy Grail of Pure Criollos” (Maricel E. Presilla)
|
“Porcelana: The Holy Grail of Pure Criollos” (Maricel E. Presilla)
|
|
|
11:24 am March 4, 2006
|
|
Ariel
|
|
|
Australia
|
|
|
|
|
Member
|
|
posts 21
|
|
|
|
|
Thanks for the calculator
Oz choc, so what if i dont understand faharenheit, is that your problem?
%…*Ariel*…%
|
|
|
|
|
1:18 pm March 4, 2006
|
|
oz_choc
|
|
|
Kandos, Australia
|
|
|
|
|
Member
|
|
posts 98
|
|
|
|
|
Ariel, I find your posts as charming and amusing as anybody – I simply ask that you don’t blame your ignorance on being Australian.
Oh, and here’s another calculator you might find useful: http://www.iqtest.com
¿!… *Sam* …!?
|
|