| User |
Post |
|
1:22 pm October 22, 2008
|
|
cocoarich
|
|
|
|
|
|
Member
|
|
posts 6
|
|
|
|
|
Could someone let me know if a chocolate fountain could be used as a cheap alternative to a melting kettle and/or tempering machine? Or maybe just in place of a bain marie?
I assume that the cheapest models would not be up to the job, but if you remove the fountain, you’d basically be left with a thermostatically controlled container.
|
|
|
10:50 pm October 22, 2008
|
|
gap
|
|
|
Melbourne, Australia
|
|
|
|
|
Member
|
|
posts 199
|
|
|
|
|
I don’t know the answer to this but i have heard you need to thin chocolate for fountains. Maybe this would mean using a fountain as a controlled contained wouldn’t work because plain couverture would be too thick? Also, would a lot of chocolate surface be exposed to air and possible contamination? Just some thoughts . . .
|
|
|
7:55 pm November 16, 2008
|
|
cocoarich
|
|
|
|
|
|
Member
|
|
posts 6
|
|
|
|
|
OK, so now I’ve actually looked at one of these in the shops… they aren’t built how I thought they’d be.
However, there are a number of ‘chocolate fondues’ around and thought they might be a cheap alternative to a bain marie. I guess you get what you pay for, but just want something small scale for holding tempered chocolate for dipping.
|
|
|
10:43 pm November 16, 2008
|
|
gap
|
|
|
Melbourne, Australia
|
|
|
|
|
Member
|
|
posts 199
|
|
|
|
|
You probably already know, but a chocolate fondue isn’t going to hold a constant temperature which you need to maintain the temper. If you’re OK with that, I’ve used a small electric blanket in the past (the sort people use for their backs). It has a few temperature settings and only cost me $20. I put it inside a big bowl and then put the smaller bowl inside that (you can cover the electric blanket with glad wrap to keep it clean). This may be another option . . .
|
|