A A A
Avatar

Please consider registering
Guest

Search

— Forum Scope —




— Match —





— Forum Options —





Minimum search word length is 4 characters - maximum search word length is 84 characters

Register Lost password?
sp_Feed sp_TopicIcon
Single origin, blends and the Porcelana craze
Avatar
Hans-Peter Rot
USA
Member
Members

Reviewers
Forum Posts: 1462
Member Since:
August 1, 2006
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
21
June 2, 2005 - 4:55 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print

Well, there are many exceptions and variables that play huge factors. For example, when considering a blend, you have to choose how many different types of varietals, or beans, you want to blend. A two-bean blend, for instance, will produce a more characterized and changing flavor, whereas a four-bean blend will yield a much more consistent flavor. So, if you have a bad bean, then yes, it is almost axiomatic for a manufacturer to incorporate it into a blend, especially from an economical standpoint.

Due to cross-hybridization, many of the beans from a plantation will not be the same type of bean unless specified otherwise. Also, nearby plantations will blend beans with each other, so when a chocolate is labeled "Venezuela," it's possible to assume that its constituents are comprised from a variety of plantations, such as Cuyagua, Choroni, etc. After all, the packaging never claimed the specific source of the beans, just the country.

The beauty and appeal of varietals, imo, is its variability. It's interesting to taste the differences in batches throughout the years. The same principle applies to wine and no one has complained [;)] But some will argue that this is the problem. Batches of varietals are often too small and mercurial in their quality year to year, so producing varietal chocolate from these beans each year doesn't produce consistent results. So I say, if you want a consistent product, then blend. However, if you still want to produce varietal chocolate, then I think it needs to be labeled with some sort of indicator to inform the consumer of the varying nature of batches.

Avatar
alex_h
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 1170
Member Since:
April 29, 2004
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
22
June 2, 2005 - 5:48 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print

ok, thanks, u 2. so "varietal" denotes single-bean, plantation, region or country? i've only been applying the word to single-bean.

Avatar
Hans-Peter Rot
USA
Member
Members

Reviewers
Forum Posts: 1462
Member Since:
August 1, 2006
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
23
June 2, 2005 - 8:01 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print

Yeah, most people associate "varietal" with single plantation, single country, and single bean type. It's rather vague and loose, and I can certainly understand the confusion that it might cause. I usually use the term "varietal" to denote single bean (e.g. Porcelana, Ocumare 61, and all other genotypes) as well, and then I use other terms appropriately, such as "single plantation" when referring to a bar such as Los Ancones, Gran Couva, et al; and "single origin" when referring to a broader location when the bar is sourced from a country such as Venezuela, Ecuador, et al. To me, this avoids confusion and narrows down the definitions with their respective meanings.

Avatar
alex_h
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 1170
Member Since:
April 29, 2004
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
24
June 3, 2005 - 9:07 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print

thanks, monte :)

Forum Timezone: Europe/London

Most Users Ever Online: 89

Currently Online:
18 Guest(s)

Currently Browsing this Page:
1 Guest(s)

Top Posters:

Hans-Peter Rot: 1462

alex_h: 1170

Martin Christy: 614

Masur: 592

Sebastian: 430

Lone Ly: 397

Newest Members:

Borntn

terryphillips

OANA PICINCU

amylia

Candy

Higor

Forum Stats:

Groups: 7

Forums: 26

Topics: 1821

Posts: 10525

 

Member Stats:

Guest Posters: 1

Members: 5092

Moderators: 0

Admins: 1

Administrators: Seventy%

Single origin, blends and the Porcelana craze | Page 2 | Fine chocolate bar discussion | Forum