A A A
Avatar

Please consider registering
Guest

Search

— Forum Scope —




— Match —





— Forum Options —





Minimum search word length is 4 characters - maximum search word length is 84 characters

Register Lost password?
sp_Feed sp_TopicIcon
old chocolate
Avatar
Hans-Peter Rot
USA
Member
Members

Reviewers
Forum Posts: 1462
Member Since:
August 1, 2006
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
1
May 25, 2004 - 3:21 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print

Here's another somewhat fun question:

What is the longest period of time any of you have stored chocolate before finally using/eating it? I kept my Slitti 100% for almost a year before eating it. Actually, I still have a Valrhona Le Lacte bar from last May that I totally forgot about hah. Maybe I should see if it's still good.

Avatar
alex_h
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 1170
Member Since:
April 29, 2004
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
2
May 25, 2004 - 4:10 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print

you mean chocolate lasts? i always wondered why they put expiry dates on the stuff :-)

i hear leysieffer (german chocolate maker) claim that chocolate gets better with age... strange. i am a bit sceptical about that.

Avatar
Hans-Peter Rot
USA
Member
Members

Reviewers
Forum Posts: 1462
Member Since:
August 1, 2006
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
3
May 26, 2004 - 7:00 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print

Chocolate lasts for a certain amount of time, as most food items do, and the expiration dates simply refer to the best times for its consumption. I've eaten "expired" chocolate, and it tasted fine. However, over too much time, chocolate will lose all the complex flavor nuances due to oxidation, odor absorption, and other factors. It's just better to eat it before the expiration date but don't think its integrity and quality will suddenly diminish after it passes an arbitrary date printed on the back of the wrapper. If stored properly, then chocolate will last quite a long time, but I necessarily agree that it gets better with age. After all, there is fat in chocolate, and fat has a tendency to go rancid if not treated properly.

Avatar
Martin Christy
London, United Kingdom
Member
Members

Reviewers
Forum Posts: 614
Member Since:
July 31, 2006
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
4
May 27, 2004 - 12:54 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print

Many chocolate makers will tell you that a 'fresh' bar is best, and this is certainly what they would want to be judged by.

I think the maximum life for a dark must be about a year and a half, if the storage is good.

Martin Christy
Editor
http://www.seventypercent.com

Martin Christy Editor www.seventypercent.com
Avatar
blakej
San Francisco, USA
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 37
Member Since:
May 16, 2004
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
5
May 27, 2004 - 5:53 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print

Any chocolate I have for longer than a year inevitably "dies" of fat bloom, since I haven't found a good home storage solution yet. This usually happens to bars that I've been putting off eating until I've written down tasting notes on them, since usually when I'm craving chocolate I'm not in an analytical mood. Once they're bloomed, of course, they're completely worthless as a tasting chocolate - not only is the texture ruined, but the nuances of flavor seem to disappear too. I recently ended up consolidating all my bloomed chocolate into a few bags, sorted roughly by percentage, without even distinguishing between the Domori and the Hachez. But it's not a waste; it makes a great base for potent hot chocolate.

Forum Timezone: Europe/London

Most Users Ever Online: 89

Currently Online:
20 Guest(s)

Currently Browsing this Page:
1 Guest(s)

Top Posters:

Hans-Peter Rot: 1462

alex_h: 1170

Martin Christy: 614

Masur: 592

Sebastian: 430

Lone Ly: 397

Newest Members:

merin

chandlerscocoa

umgejelawum

izekusinoga

icmuyejimpa

Marique

Forum Stats:

Groups: 7

Forums: 26

Topics: 1813

Posts: 10602

 

Member Stats:

Guest Posters: 1

Members: 5023

Moderators: 0

Admins: 1

Administrators: Seventy%

old chocolate | General Discussions | Forum