A A A
Avatar

Please consider registering
Guest

Search

— Forum Scope —




— Match —





— Forum Options —





Minimum search word length is 4 characters - maximum search word length is 84 characters

Register Lost password?
sp_Feed sp_TopicIcon
$25,000 cholate dessert sets Guinness record
Avatar
Masur
Stockholm, Sweden
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 592
Member Since:
August 6, 2006
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
1
November 8, 2007 - 11:41 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print

quote:


A New York City restaurateur unveiled a $25,000 chocolate sundae on Wednesday, setting a Guinness world record for the most expensive dessert. . . .
"Frrozen Haute Chocolate," a blend of 28 cocoas, including 14 of the most expensive and exotic from around the globe.

The article:
[url]http://www.reuters.com/article/domesticNews/idUSN0753679220071107?feedType=RSS&feedName=domesticNews&rpc=22&sp=true[/url]

Serendipity 3 website:
[url]http://www.serendipity3.com/[/url]

Anyone tempted?

"Porcelana: The Holy Grail of Pure Criollos" (Maricel E. Presilla)

"Porcelana: The Holy Grail of Pure Criollos" (Maricel E. Presilla)
Avatar
Hans-Peter Rot
USA
Member
Members

Reviewers
Forum Posts: 1462
Member Since:
August 1, 2006
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
2
November 8, 2007 - 11:19 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print

I think it's quite obscene and wasteful, more so than the following recipe I incidentally received in an E-mail this afternoon about a hot chocolate recipe served in a B.R. Guest restaurant (in NY). It calls for 1 cup of Amedei Chuao chocolate, then of all things: 1 cup cocoa powder, 1 cup brown sugar, 2 cups cream, 1 cup sugar, 2 tbsp. water. This is just disgusting, folks, so let's end it at that.

In the Serendipity 3 case, why bother blending 28 "cocoas," and more to the point, 14 of the world's rarest and most exotic? In no way possible will one ever taste the unique flavor of each "cocoa." It's maddening.

Avatar
Alex Rast
Manchester, United Kingdom
Member
Members

Reviewers
Forum Posts: 283
Member Since:
October 13, 2009
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
3
November 9, 2007 - 12:58 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print

quote:


Originally posted by Montegrano

I think it's quite obscene and wasteful, more so than the following recipe I incidentally received in an E-mail this afternoon about a hot chocolate recipe served in a B.R. Guest restaurant (in NY). It calls for 1 cup of Amedei Chuao chocolate, then of all things: 1 cup cocoa powder, 1 cup brown sugar, 2 cups cream, 1 cup sugar, 2 tbsp. water. This is just disgusting, folks, so let's end it at that.

In the Serendipity 3 case, why bother blending 28 "cocoas," and more to the point, 14 of the world's rarest and most exotic? In no way possible will one ever taste the unique flavor of each "cocoa." It's maddening.


Yeah, I've always wondered about that. What makes so many people thing a greater number of *types* of cocoa in the same recipe will somehow make things better? More often than not it just ends up confusing flavours, and with 28 the end will be nothing but generic. Furthermore, note that 14 are apparently *not* in the "rarest and most exotic category... could these be Callebaut bulk couvertures?[;)] I also think that unless they're prepared to state exactly what the identity of the 28 are this is useless information. For anyone interested in chocolate, unless you actually can know which chocolates were used, knowing that there were 28 doesn't help you appreciate the result in the slightest.

There *is* a place for different chocolates in a dessert, when you have a piece built up of components, where each component is different and works best with a different chocolate - but here this requires careful skill in selection and matching.

An equally perplexing thing I see all the time is people trying to come up with the "ultimate" chocolate recipes for chocoholics - supposedly the most intensely chocolatey experiences - and seek to achieve this with different classes of chocolate, so that the piece will claim to use 3 chocolates, bittersweet, semisweet, and milk. Of course if you want the most intensely chocolatey experience this isn't what you want to do at all - you want instead to triple the amount of bittersweet.

I note also that the chocolate dessert in question is frozen. While there is a place for chilled chocolate desserts, the most intense and involving chocolate desserts are warm, because chocolate's flavour fades when chilled, and it seems especially bizarre to introduce this with winter coming on. Notice also that the price is artificially inflated - in the sense that a great deal of the price isn't in the chocolate itself or in the labour that went into the manufacture but rather to non-chocolate ingredients (gold) and paraphernalia.

One proposal that I might make, though, to counter such absurdities: Why not round up a really good celebrity chef with a passion for chocolate desserts to create something truly special and extraordinary without the use of extraneous and unessential ingredients, with a price tag to beat the aforementioned item, the proceeds of the sale thereof to go to a fund to improve working conditions in chocolate-producing areas? That would be a positive way to make a record.

Alex Rast
Alex_Rast_Alternate@hushmail.com

Alex Rast Alex_Rast_Alternate@hushmail.com
Avatar
Hans-Peter Rot
USA
Member
Members

Reviewers
Forum Posts: 1462
Member Since:
August 1, 2006
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
4
November 9, 2007 - 2:04 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print

In the Serendipity 3 article, the chocolate portion of the dessert was restricted to only the first paragraph while the rest of the article was describing in great detail where and how much edible gold leaf was provided in the dessert.

Instead of 28 "cocoas" you can certainly utilize an average chocolate, say Callebaut 6040, and create essentially the same flavor and save yourself some money and labor. Obviously, the intent is to impress (and attract) those with big wallets, not guys and gals like us who actually are concerned with such matters as, oh I don't know, taste and skill.

Furthermore, in some ways it ingrains into minds that exorbitance is almost always better, particularly on the subconscious level, where one doesn't see how limited advertising has inflated the quality of very average ingredients.

Avatar
seneca
USA
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 208
Member Since:
May 22, 2005
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
5
November 16, 2007 - 9:44 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print

In a rather amusing irony, I found this today while trolling the chocolate news:
http://today.reuters.co.uk/new.....OACHES.XML

http://bittersweetcafe.blogspot.com
http://www.bittersweetcafe.com

http://bittersweetcafe.blogspot.com http://www.bittersweetcafe.com
Avatar
Sebastian
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 430
Member Since:
September 30, 2004
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
6
November 16, 2007 - 10:12 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print

who knew the mice had such good taste?

Forum Timezone: Europe/London

Most Users Ever Online: 89

Currently Online: nnvalentasun
13 Guest(s)

Currently Browsing this Page:
1 Guest(s)

Top Posters:

Hans-Peter Rot: 1462

alex_h: 1170

Martin Christy: 614

Masur: 592

Sebastian: 430

Lone Ly: 397

Newest Members:

Almudena Ponce de León Riaño

lalala

Anthony Matulewicz

James Nichols

Youngjoo Go

Test_1

Forum Stats:

Groups: 7

Forums: 26

Topics: 1811

Posts: 10597

 

Member Stats:

Guest Posters: 1

Members: 4927

Moderators: 0

Admins: 1

Administrators: Seventy%

$25,000 cholate dessert sets Guinness record | News | Forum