Please consider registering
guest

Log In Register

Register | Lost password?
Advanced Search

— Forum Scope —

  

— Match —

   

— Forum Options —

   

Minimum search word length is 4 characters - maximum search word length is 84 characters

Topic RSS
$25,000 cholate dessert sets Guinness record
November 8, 2007
11:41 am
Masur
Stockholm, Sweden
Member
Forum Posts: 592
Member Since:
August 6, 2006
Offline

quote:


A New York City restaurateur unveiled a $25,000 chocolate sundae on Wednesday, setting a Guinness world record for the most expensive dessert. . . .
"Frrozen Haute Chocolate," a blend of 28 cocoas, including 14 of the most expensive and exotic from around the globe.

The article:
[url]http://www.reuters.com/article/domesticNews/idUSN0753679220071107?feedType=RSS&feedName=domesticNews&rpc=22&sp=true[/url]

Serendipity 3 website:
[url]http://www.serendipity3.com/[/url]

Anyone tempted?

"Porcelana: The Holy Grail of Pure Criollos" (Maricel E. Presilla)

"Porcelana: The Holy Grail of Pure Criollos" (Maricel E. Presilla)
November 8, 2007
11:19 pm
Hans-Peter Rot
USA
Member
Forum Posts: 1462
Member Since:
August 1, 2006
Offline

I think it's quite obscene and wasteful, more so than the following recipe I incidentally received in an E-mail this afternoon about a hot chocolate recipe served in a B.R. Guest restaurant (in NY). It calls for 1 cup of Amedei Chuao chocolate, then of all things: 1 cup cocoa powder, 1 cup brown sugar, 2 cups cream, 1 cup sugar, 2 tbsp. water. This is just disgusting, folks, so let's end it at that.

In the Serendipity 3 case, why bother blending 28 "cocoas," and more to the point, 14 of the world's rarest and most exotic? In no way possible will one ever taste the unique flavor of each "cocoa." It's maddening.

November 9, 2007
12:58 am
Alex Rast
Manchester, United Kingdom
Member
Forum Posts: 283
Member Since:
October 13, 2009
Offline

quote:


Originally posted by Montegrano

I think it's quite obscene and wasteful, more so than the following recipe I incidentally received in an E-mail this afternoon about a hot chocolate recipe served in a B.R. Guest restaurant (in NY). It calls for 1 cup of Amedei Chuao chocolate, then of all things: 1 cup cocoa powder, 1 cup brown sugar, 2 cups cream, 1 cup sugar, 2 tbsp. water. This is just disgusting, folks, so let's end it at that.

In the Serendipity 3 case, why bother blending 28 "cocoas," and more to the point, 14 of the world's rarest and most exotic? In no way possible will one ever taste the unique flavor of each "cocoa." It's maddening.


Yeah, I've always wondered about that. What makes so many people thing a greater number of *types* of cocoa in the same recipe will somehow make things better? More often than not it just ends up confusing flavours, and with 28 the end will be nothing but generic. Furthermore, note that 14 are apparently *not* in the "rarest and most exotic category... could these be Callebaut bulk couvertures?[;)] I also think that unless they're prepared to state exactly what the identity of the 28 are this is useless information. For anyone interested in chocolate, unless you actually can know which chocolates were used, knowing that there were 28 doesn't help you appreciate the result in the slightest.

There *is* a place for different chocolates in a dessert, when you have a piece built up of components, where each component is different and works best with a different chocolate - but here this requires careful skill in selection and matching.

An equally perplexing thing I see all the time is people trying to come up with the "ultimate" chocolate recipes for chocoholics - supposedly the most intensely chocolatey experiences - and seek to achieve this with different classes of chocolate, so that the piece will claim to use 3 chocolates, bittersweet, semisweet, and milk. Of course if you want the most intensely chocolatey experience this isn't what you want to do at all - you want instead to triple the amount of bittersweet.

I note also that the chocolate dessert in question is frozen. While there is a place for chilled chocolate desserts, the most intense and involving chocolate desserts are warm, because chocolate's flavour fades when chilled, and it seems especially bizarre to introduce this with winter coming on. Notice also that the price is artificially inflated - in the sense that a great deal of the price isn't in the chocolate itself or in the labour that went into the manufacture but rather to non-chocolate ingredients (gold) and paraphernalia.

One proposal that I might make, though, to counter such absurdities: Why not round up a really good celebrity chef with a passion for chocolate desserts to create something truly special and extraordinary without the use of extraneous and unessential ingredients, with a price tag to beat the aforementioned item, the proceeds of the sale thereof to go to a fund to improve working conditions in chocolate-producing areas? That would be a positive way to make a record.

Alex Rast
Alex_Rast_Alternate@hushmail.com

Alex Rast Alex_Rast_Alternate@hushmail.com
November 9, 2007
2:04 am
Hans-Peter Rot
USA
Member
Forum Posts: 1462
Member Since:
August 1, 2006
Offline

In the Serendipity 3 article, the chocolate portion of the dessert was restricted to only the first paragraph while the rest of the article was describing in great detail where and how much edible gold leaf was provided in the dessert.

Instead of 28 "cocoas" you can certainly utilize an average chocolate, say Callebaut 6040, and create essentially the same flavor and save yourself some money and labor. Obviously, the intent is to impress (and attract) those with big wallets, not guys and gals like us who actually are concerned with such matters as, oh I don't know, taste and skill.

Furthermore, in some ways it ingrains into minds that exorbitance is almost always better, particularly on the subconscious level, where one doesn't see how limited advertising has inflated the quality of very average ingredients.

November 16, 2007
9:44 pm
seneca
USA
Member
Forum Posts: 208
Member Since:
May 22, 2005
Offline

In a rather amusing irony, I found this today while trolling the chocolate news:
http://today.reuters.co.uk/new.....OACHES.XML

http://bittersweetcafe.blogspot.com
http://www.bittersweetcafe.com

http://bittersweetcafe.blogspot.com http://www.bittersweetcafe.com
November 16, 2007
10:12 pm
Sebastian
Member
Forum Posts: 430
Member Since:
September 30, 2004
Offline

who knew the mice had such good taste?

$25,000 cholate dessert sets Guinness record | News | Forum